THE GIFT OF FAITH and THE MAGISTERIUM – By Father Paul A. Duffner, O.P.

Posted on October 9, 2008. Filed under: Uncategorized |

By Father Paul A. Duffner, O.P.

The Rosary Light & Life – Vol 50, No 2,

The Christian virtue that we have considered most often in this bulletin is the supernatural virtue of faith, and we have done so for several reasons. Faith is the very foundation of the Christian life, without which one’s knowledge is limited to only what he knows by the light of reason. Yet, basic and essential as this virtue is, it is only superficially understood and lived by many who have received this divine gift. It is a free gift of God which we did not and cannot merit, but a gift that carries with it certain obligations that must be fulfilled if it is not to be lost. This infused virtue of faith has been defined by the first Vatican Council as follows:
“Faith is a supernatural virtue whereby under the inspiration and assistance of grace we believe those things revealed by God to be true, not because the intrinsic truth of those things revealed by God has been perceived by the light of reason, but because of the authority of God Himself revealing, who can neither deceive nor be deceived.” (Sess. III, ch.3)
Faith, then, is the acceptance of another’s testimony concerning some particular matter which is unknown to the believer himself. And in this case it is the testimony of God Himself, Who is infinite TRUTH. So the reason why we believe what God has revealed is obvious. The function of the Church is to point out what truths God has revealed, that is, what truths are contained – whether expressly or implicitly – in God’s revelation. This function of the Church is clearly defined in the above Council:
“All those things are to be believed, on divine and Catholic faith, which are contained in the written and unwritten word of God, and which are proposed by the Church as divinely revealed, whether that is accomplished through her solemn pronouncements, or through her ordinary and universal magisterium.” (ibid)
So the Church is not the source of divine faith, but its transmitter, its guardian, its interpreter. She has been established by Christ for that very purpose, and has been promised the special assistance of the Holy Spirit in the fulfillment of those functions.
Key words in the above definition are those which express how the Church declares certain things are divinely revealed, namely, through her “solemn pronouncements” (i.e. her extraordinary magisterium), or her “ordinary and universal magisterium.” To understand clearly the obligation the virtue of faith imposes on us, it will be helpful to examine what the MAGISTERIUM is, and what is its origin.
THE MAGISTERIUM OF THE CHURCH
The word “magisterium” is taken from the Latin word “magister” meaning teacher, and is the divinely established teaching authority of the Church. The second Vatican Council speaks of it as follows: “The task of authentically interpreting the word of God, whether written (Scripture) or handed down (tradition), has been entrusted exclusively to the living teaching office of the Church, whose authority is exercised in the name of Jesus Christ.” (Lumen Gentium, n.4)
The Magisterium, or the official teaching authority in the Church, is invested in the Roman Pontiff, and those Bishops who teach in union with him; and this teaching authority is exercised in various ways:
The solemn or extraordinary magisterium is exercised when the Pope alone teaches solemnly (ex cathedra), that is, in a formal, definitive and public way that is addressed to the whole Church, and declares a precise meaning of God’s word as binding in faith upon the whole Church; and when, in the same manner, a teaching comes from the Bishops together with the Pope (as in an ecumenical council). Such teaching, by the special guidance of the Holy Spirit is infallibly free from error.
The ordinary magisterium is exercised when the Pope or Bishops in union with him express the meaning of God’s word in the normal course of the performance of their pastoral teaching responsibility. Both of these exercises of the magisterium are authoritative and require the assent of Roman Catholics. (Lumen Gentium, n. 25) The ordinary magisterium may also be infallible when Bishops scattered throughout the world together with the Pope, in their capacity as authentic teachers of faith and morals, agree on a teaching to be held as definitive. (Canon Law, 749, §2)
The U.S. Bishops’ Committee on Doctrine referred to this when they issued a critical evaluation of the two-volume work of Fr. Richard McBrien entitled “Catholicism.”
“In addition to those doctrines which have been taught by the Magisterium of the Church in the extraordinary way of infallible definitions, the ordinary teaching of the Pope and the Bishops in union with him preserves many revealed truths which have never been solemnly defined, but which, nevertheless, are infallibly true and definable.”
THE DIVINE ORIGIN OF THE MAGISTERIUM
The authentic teaching authority of the Church was conferred on the apostles by Christ Himself, having its origin in the Father. “As the Father has sent Me, so I send you.” (Jn. 20:21) “He who hears you hears Me, and he who rejects you rejects Me; and he who rejects Me, rejects Him Who sent Me.” (Lk. 10:16) “All power in heaven and on earth has been given to Me. Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you; and behold, I am with you all days, even unto the consummation of the world.” (Mt. 28:18-20)
This teaching authority conferred by Christ upon Peter and the apostles was handed down to their successors, namely, the Roman Pontiff as successor of Peter, and the Bishops of the Church as successors of the apostles. While the Magisterium of the Bishops is the same as that of the apostles, individual Bishops are not infallible as the apostles were. After the last of the apostles only the Roman Pontiff has personal infallibility.
We have stressed the divine origin and the hierarchical nature of the Magisterium, for some theologians and scholars, ignoring the clear teaching of Vatican II that the task of authentically interpreting divine revelation has been entrusted exclusively to the hierarchy (Dei Verbum, 10), claim the “right to dissent” from the official teaching of the Church. They believe that, as a class or category, they form a kind of parallel Magisterium, as if their opinions constitute an alternative voice to that of the Church’s Magisterium – which is the voice of Christ. (Lk. 10:16)
Because of this, when some theologians publish opinions that differ from the official teaching of the Church (and dissent usually gets better press than the Magisterium) we hear the comment from some “We have a choice,” as if the opinion of private theologians or canonists (no matter how renowned) carries the same weight as that of the official teaching office of the Church. This involves not only an undermining of the gift of faith, and a rebellion against the authority of the Church, but an attack on the very nature of the Church as Christ founded it, conferring on the apostles and their successors the threefold powers of teaching, of governing, and of sanctifying.
The Church does not change its teaching to fit the mentality of the times. It cannot do so, because it is based on the revealed word of God. (Gaudium & Spes, n.51) Pope Paul VI spoke of this in an audience in January of 1972:
“The teaching Church does not invent her doctrines; she is a witness, a custodian, an interpreter, a transmitter. As regards the truth of Christian marriage, she can be called conservative, uncompromising. To those who would urge her to make her faith easier, more in keeping with the tastes of the changing mentality of the times, she answers with the apostles, we cannot do so.”
THE ROLE OF THEOLOGIANS
As various Popes have declared, theologians have an important role in the research and clarification of doctrine. But as Pope Paul VI pointed out, while theology and the Magisterium have a common source, namely, Divine Revelation, they have different duties. It is the role of the theologian to examine and seek new applications to the truths contained in the deposit of faith; while it is the role of the Magisterium to pass authoritative judgment on the teaching and considerations proposed by theologians as solutions to new questions. The Magisterium may not be capable of doing the work and research that theologians do, but it is capable – with the help of the Holy Spirit promised by Christ – of making the final judgment as to the accuracy of their work.
Individual priests and theologians have a teaching mission in the Church; but their mission is not of divine origin, but ecclesiastical. It is a participation in divine authority, because it is delegated by the Roman Pontiff and Bishops. But, for the same reason, it can be recalled if not properly used, as happened in the case of the German theologian Hans Kueng. A clear reminder of the duty of obedience to the Magisterium of the Church is brought out in the Declaration of the Sacred Congregation for the Doctrine of Faith regarding some points of theological doctrine of Fr. Kueng, published in 1979 by order of Pope John Paul II:
“If it should happen that a teacher of sacred doctrine chooses and disseminates as the norm of truth, his own judgment and not the thought of the Church, and if he continues in his conviction, despite the use of all charitable means in his regard, then honesty itself demands that the Church should publicly call attention to his conduct, and should state that he can no longer teach with the authority of the mission he has received from her.”
THE DANGERS OF DISSENT
In spite of the clear teaching regarding the Magisterium, and the obligation of the faithful to assent to the Church’s official pronouncements, there seems to be a disregard of some of its official teachings in almost epidemic proportions. How many, influenced by the non-Christian culture of our day, and misled by statements of dissenting theologians and teachers, have (with a clear conscience, they say) disregarded the clear moral teaching of the Church. How much this dissent has undermined respect for the teaching authority of the Church is clear from the Doctrinal Statement of the Irish Episcopal Conference on Conscience and Morality:
“In practice, those who dissent from the authoritative Church teaching very often give as their reason for doing so, not so much their own personal insights, as the authority of dissenting theologians. This, however, is to misunderstand the role of the theologians in the Church, for their authority does not, and cannot, outweigh the authority of the Pope in declaring faith in the Church.”
In keeping with this same idea, Pope John Paul, in an audience on the “ad limina” visit of the Bishops of the state of New York in 1988, reminded them that pluralism in theology is limited by the unity of faith and the teachings of the Church’s authentic Magisterium. He commented:
“With the passing of time it is ever more evident how certain positions on the so-called ‘right to dissent’ have had harmful repercussions on the moral conduct of a number of the faithful. It has been noted that there is a tendency on the part of some Catholics to be selective in their adherence to the Church’s moral teaching. Some appeal to ‘freedom of conscience’ to justify this way of acting. Therefore, it is necessary to clarify that it is not conscience that ‘freely’ establishes what is right and wrong.”
As Cardinal Newman once pointed out, conscience does not determine moral truth, but only detects it, and that only when it has been formed in keeping with the teachings of the Church. Since the Church’s teaching is arrived at through the special guidance of the Holy Spirit, one would be deceiving himself if he thought that same Holy Spirit was guiding his conscience in a way contrary to the official teaching of the Magisterium. Pope John Paul II reminded the faithful in a general audience Aug. 17, 1983:
“It is not sufficient to say to man: ‘Always follow your conscience.’ It is necessary to add immediately and always: ‘Ask yourself if your conscience is telling you the truth or something else, and seek untiringly to know the truth. If we were not to make this necessary clarification, man would risk to find in his conscience a force which is destructive of his true humanity, rather than the holy place where God reveals to him his true good.”
THE OBLIGATION OF OUR CATHOLIC FAITH
We began these reflections with the first Vatican Council’s definition of the gift of faith, stressing the obligation of assent of mind and will to those teachings which the Church has declared are divinely revealed. This was further emphasized by the second Vatican Council when it declared that “religious submission of will and mind must be shown in a special way to the authentic teachings of the Roman Pontiff even when he is not speaking ‘ex cathedra.’” (L.G. 25)
Human governments and organizations can make laws binding on its citizens or members as regards what they are to do or not do, to promote their respective goals. But no human government or organization can make laws binding on its members as to what they believe, for they have no way of knowing the inner workings of the mind. Only God, who knows our innermost thoughts and desires, can require the submission of mind and will, such as occurs in a supernatural act of faith. However, that submission of mind and will (even when we do not see the reasons for it) does not come easy for our proud nature. St. Thomas Aquinas, the great mind and great saint that he was, was well aware that pride is a great stumbling block in the matter of divine faith. That is why he pointed out that “humility removes pride whereby a man refuses to submit himself to the truth of faith.” (II II, 4,7) Such a one refuses what St. Paul calls the “obedience of faith.” (Rom. 1:5; 16:27) He refuses to accept some teaching merely on the authority which Christ has established. The virtue of faith needs humility to guard it, to remove pride which hinders that humble submission of the mind to the truth of faith, and which gives rise to dissent.
Because there can be no infused supernatural virtue without the foundation of supernatural faith, when respect for the teaching authority of the Church has been undermined by dissent, there is a corresponding erosion of respect for the Church’s ruling power and the consequent obligation of obedience, so evident in the Church today.
Consequently, what the Church teaches as divinely revealed is not open for debate for those guided by the light of faith. We either accept it, or reject it. There is no middle course. He who is TRUTH itself has told us: “He that is not with me, is against Me.” (Mt. 12:30) But many of the Church’s laws and regulations do not deal directly with doctrine, but more with disciplinary matters. This involves not so much the virtue of faith, but that of obedience. But as we have pointed out these two virtues are so dependent on each other that when one is weak, so is the other. In seeking help in regard to this fundamental gift of faith, we would do well to turn to the Mother of Jesus and our Mother, the perfect model of humble faith. “Blessed is she who has believed.” (Lk.1:45) Ask her to obtain for you a humble openness of mind and heart to the action of the Holy Spirit revealing God’s message through the authoritative teachings of the Church.—————–
thanks to :
Theology for the Laity

The Light and Life is mailed to all those who are members of the Rosary Confraternity. You may also subscribe without being a member of the confraternity

http://www.rosary-center.org/trll.htm

Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: